← Vault Index
Source: frameworks/kit-project-plan/01-project-plan-context.md

Project Plan — Context & Inputs

Required Inputs

1. Constraint Priority Matrix (Primary Driver)

The CPM is the single most important input. Every project plan section traces back to constraint analysis.

FieldPriorityDescription
Constraint name + IDRequiredEach constraint gets a unique ID (C1, C2, etc.) scoped to this initiative
Constraint tierRequiredUpstream/Co-Primary, Secondary, or Downstream
Pattern markersRequiredRecurring, Escalating, Same Root Cause, Solve Together
GPS dataRequiredPosition, Direction, Speed for the initiative
Recommended actionsRequiredWhat the CPM says should happen — drives build design

2. Session Transcript(s)

FieldPriorityDescription
Key quotesRequiredDirect quotes that serve as evidence for constraints and builds
Decisions madeRequiredAny commitments, approvals, or direction changes
New informationRequiredFacts about tools, team, processes not previously known
Prework receivedIf presentItems the client said they'd provide and did
Open questionsIf presentQuestions that surfaced and need resolution

3. Client Reference Data

FieldPriorityDescription
Client nameRequiredCanonical spelling
Company nameRequiredCanonical spelling
Team membersRequiredNames, roles, correct spellings — overrides transcript
Tools in useRequiredSoftware, platforms — correct names
Engagement detailsRequiredRate, cadence, start date

4. Master Plan

FieldPriorityDescription
Initiative listingRequiredConfirms this initiative exists and is active
Cross-initiative constraintsIf presentConstraints that affect multiple initiatives
Engagement GPSReferenceMaster plan GPS provides broader context

5. Existing Project Plan (Mode 2 only)

FieldPriorityDescription
Current build statusesRequiredWhere each build stands in deploy chain
Outstanding actionsRequiredWhat was due and what's still open
Prework statusRequiredWhat's been received vs still needed
Timeline progressRequiredWhich weeks are complete

Input Priority Hierarchy

When inputs conflict:

  1. Reference data wins for names, spellings, tools (canonical source)
  2. Session transcript wins for decisions, new facts, client quotes
  3. CPM wins for constraint classification and priority
  4. Master plan wins for cross-initiative context
  5. Previous project plan provides continuity — update, don't discard

What Drives Each Section

SectionPrimary InputSupporting Inputs
HeaderReference dataMaster plan (initiative scope)
Matrix Validation BannerCPMSession transcript
GPSCPM + sessionPrevious GPS (for trajectory)
Current State vs TargetCPM + sessionPrevious state items
Deployment Plan (builds)CPM recommendations + session decisionsPrevious build statuses
ConstraintsCPMSession (new evidence)
ThemesCPM + session patternsPrevious themes
StakeholdersReference data + sessionPrevious stakeholder cards
PreworkSession + project planPrevious prework status
EvidenceSession transcriptPrevious quotes
Product ConstraintsSession observationsPrevious coaching notes
NotesSession + reference dataPrevious notes
ActionsSession decisionsPrevious outstanding actions
TimelineBuild statuses + sessionPrevious timeline

Validation Rules