← Vault Index
Source: frameworks/kit-blueprint-mapping-session/04-blueprint-mapping-session-quality.md

Blueprint Mapping Session — Quality Checklist

Pass threshold: 90 / 100 points When to run: After every draft, before presenting to Kathryn for review. Applies to: Both client-facing deliverables (written summary email + 90-day blueprint).


Part A: Written Summary Email (50 points)

Structure (15 points)

#CheckPoints
A1Opening references a specific moment or outcome from the session — not a generic "great session"3
A2Decisions captured: the direction chosen and why are stated clearly3
A3First action is restated with deadline3
A4Deliverables listed: what the client will receive (blueprint, recording, resources)3
A5Closing is warm, specific, and brief — not motivational or generic3

Content Accuracy (15 points)

#CheckPoints
A6Every claim traces to what was discussed in the session — nothing fabricated5
A7Client's name, company name, and any proper nouns are spelled correctly3
A8Decisions attributed to the client are things they actually committed to, not the advisor's unconfirmed recommendations4
A9No assumptions beyond what the client said (years in industry, revenue, team size — only include if stated)3

Voice & Boundaries (20 points)

#CheckPoints
A10Reads as peer advisory — not coaching, not meeting minutes, not a transcript summary5
A11Zero AI tells: no "That's exactly the kind of...", no inspirational reframing, no narrating behavior5
A12Does not sell Advisory OS, Deploy Sprint, or any other offer4
A13Does not promise ongoing support or imply a future relationship3
A14Does not over-explain why the client's own decisions matter3

Part B: 90-Day Blueprint (50 points)

Structure (15 points)

#CheckPoints
B1All sections present: Header, Opening Frame, The Decision, The Offer, 90-Day Timeline, First Action, Resources, Footer5
B2Single-file HTML, self-contained (no external dependencies except Google Fonts)3
B3Responsive — renders correctly on desktop and mobile3
B4Footer includes advisor name, company, and session date2
B5Doc type reads "90-Day Blueprint" — not "Client Blueprint" or "Blueprint"2

Content Accuracy (15 points)

#CheckPoints
B6Opening Frame uses the client's own words or observable facts — not diagnosis or interpretation4
B7The Decision section states the ONE direction chosen — not multiple options3
B8The Offer section is concrete: name, audience, price range, delivery format3
B9Timeline has specific named actions per month — not aspirational buckets like "define strategy"3
B10First Action is a single concrete thing with a 48-hour deadline2

Design & Tone (10 points)

#CheckPoints
B11Design language matches vault standards: Cormorant Garamond + Inter, warm/professional palette3
B12Zero internal jargon in any section (constraint, CPM, deploy chain, build, GPS, Mode)3
B13Warm and direct tone — not clinical, not casual, not motivational2
B14Resources section contains actual useful items, not placeholder text2

Differentiation from Ongoing Blueprint (10 points)

#CheckPoints
B15No build cards — uses monthly milestones instead3
B16No deploy chain or 8-stage process2
B17No prework / "What We Need From You" section2
B18No status badges (Active/Queued) — this is not a living document2
B19No "Questions We'll Work Through" — questions were resolved in the session1

Required-Revise Triggers

Any of these automatically fails the QC regardless of point total:

  1. Fabricated detail — any claim that doesn't trace to intake answers or session transcript
  2. Sells another offer — any mention of Advisory OS, Deploy Sprint, or "next steps together"
  3. Internal jargon in client deliverable — any use of constraint, CPM, deploy chain, GPS, Mode
  4. Wrong client name or company — factual error in the header or body
  5. Missing First Action — the most important element of the blueprint is absent or vague