Our quality framework assesses five critical dimensions: Strategic Alignment, Technical Execution, Change Readiness, Financial Impact, and Sustainability. Each dimension has specific scoring criteria, validation checkpoints, and acceptance thresholds.
| Dimension | Green (90-100) | Yellow (70-89) | Red (Below 70) | Weight |
| Strategic Alignment |
Design fully aligns with strategy; 95%+ leadership alignment; 3-5 year vision clear |
Design mostly aligned; 80-90% leadership alignment; some strategic gaps |
Strategic alignment unclear; <80% leadership support; significant gaps |
25% |
| Technical Execution |
Perfect implementation; all systems integrated; zero critical bugs; processes documented |
Good execution; minor issues; 95%+ system uptime; most processes documented |
Significant technical issues; system problems; incomplete documentation |
25% |
| Change Readiness |
90%+ organizational readiness; leadership aligned; training 100% complete; adoption tracking |
70-85% readiness; mostly aligned; 80%+ trained; some adoption measurement |
<70% readiness; leadership gaps; inadequate training; no adoption tracking |
20% |
| Financial Impact |
Exceeds target ROI by 20%+; clear benefit realization; detailed tracking; >100% payback |
Meets ROI target; reasonable benefit tracking; 80-100% payback within 24 months |
ROI below target; weak benefit tracking; <80% payback likelihood |
20% |
| Sustainability |
Strong governance; clear ownership; metrics dashboards; quarterly reviews established |
Adequate governance; identified owners; basic metrics; periodic reviews |
Weak governance; unclear ownership; no metrics; no review process |
10% |