← Vault Index
Source: business/products/consulting-practice-sop-manual/runners/diagnostic-call-prep-routine-runner-SKILL.md

name: diagnostic-call-prep-routine-runner description: > Runs the full diagnostic call prep routine — prospect profiling, hypothesis generation, tailored question sequence, and call architecture. When a qualified prospect books a diagnostic call. metadata: author: "Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders" version: "1.0.0" date: "2026-04-28" sop: "Diagnostic Call Prep Routine" category: "Business Development" frequency: "Trigger-Based" estimated-time: "30 min" trigger: "When a qualified prospect books a diagnostic call"


Diagnostic Call Prep Routine — Runner

You are executing the Diagnostic Call Prep Routine SOP for an independent consultant. Diagnostic calls are where engagements are won or lost — most consultants walk in with nothing more than a LinkedIn scan and good intentions. This runner builds a hypothesis-driven prep brief so you diagnose instead of just discover.

Do not skip steps. Do not ask questions across multiple turns — collect everything upfront.


What you'll have when this is done: A complete call prep brief with tailored diagnostic questions, a hypothesis about the prospect's primary constraint, and a clear engagement framing — ready to execute the moment the call starts.

Step 1: Collect Your Inputs

Ask the user for the following (all at once, in a single prompt):

Prospect Information:

Intake and Correspondence:

Pipeline Context:

Your Practice Context:

If the user doesn't have intake form data or detailed correspondence, accept what's available — the skill generates hypotheses from industry patterns when direct signals are thin.

Step 2: Build the Prospect Profile

Compile a 4–6 line briefing from the inputs. This reads like a briefing, not a form:

Format:

### Prospect Profile
[4–6 line briefing synthesizing available information]
Missing: [What you don't know yet]

Step 3: Generate Working Hypotheses

Based on the profile, generate 1–2 hypotheses about the prospect's primary constraint. Each hypothesis gets:

If intake data is thin, generate hypotheses from industry patterns. A company of [size] in [industry] with [source channel] most commonly faces [constraint]. Don't hedge — commit to a hypothesis and design questions to test it. Wrong hypotheses still produce better calls than no hypotheses.

Format:

### Working Hypotheses
1. **[Hypothesis statement]**
   - Signal: [What in the profile supports this]
   - Test: "[Specific question to confirm or disprove]"

Step 4: Build Diagnostic Questions

Build 8–12 questions organized in three tiers:

Tier 1 — Opening (2–3 questions): Broad, warm, gets them talking. "Walk me through how [specific thing] works in your practice right now." Confirm basic facts and build rapport. Include one "permission to be direct" question: "I'm going to ask some pointed questions — is that alright?"

Tier 2 — Diagnostic (4–6 questions): Pointed questions that test the hypotheses. Each question names a specific operational area and asks for a concrete example. "When was the last time [specific scenario]? What happened?" Avoid yes/no framing. Every question must connect to the prospect profile or the hypothesis — no generic discovery questions.

Tier 3 — Impact (2–3 questions): Connect the constraint to business outcomes. "What does that cost you in a typical quarter — in time, revenue, or opportunities?" Establish urgency without manufacturing it.

Format:

### Diagnostic Questions
**Opening**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]

**Diagnostic**
- [Question 1] — Tests: [hypothesis element]
- [Question 2] — Tests: [hypothesis element]
- [Question 3]
- [Question 4]

**Impact**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]

Step 5: Build the Call Flow

Build a time-blocked call structure with exact language for the open and close — not prompts to improvise:

TimeSectionKey Move
0–5 minFrame"[Exact opening language — what you'll cover, what the outcome is, how long it'll take]"
5–25 minDiagnoseWork through tiers, follow threads, update hypotheses live
25–35 minReflect"Here's what I'm hearing…" — share initial observations, not a prescription
35–40 minClose"[Exact closing language — either 'Here's what I'd recommend as a next step' or 'I don't think I'm the right fit — here's who might be']"

Calibrate the opening and closing language to the user's practice context and offer structure from Step 1. The framing section is the 60-second explanation of how you work, calibrated to the prospect's situation.

Step 6: Red Flags and Green Lights

Build two short lists:

Green Lights (signals this is a good-fit prospect):

Red Flags (signals to watch for):

Watch For:

Step 7: Assemble the Call Prep Brief

Combine all outputs into a single document under 700 words. This is a pre-call scan, not a research report:

# Diagnostic Call Prep: [Prospect Name]
## [Company] | [Industry] | Source: [How they found you]

### Prospect Profile
[4–6 line briefing synthesizing available information]
Missing: [What you don't know yet]

### Working Hypotheses
1. **[Hypothesis statement]**
   - Signal: [What in the profile supports this]
   - Test: "[Specific question to confirm or disprove]"

### Diagnostic Questions
**Opening**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]

**Diagnostic**
- [Question 1] — Tests: [hypothesis element]
- [Question 2] — Tests: [hypothesis element]
- [Question 3]
- [Question 4]

**Impact**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]

### Call Flow
| Time | Section | Key Move |
|------|---------|----------|
| 0–5 min | Frame | "[Exact opening language]" |
| 5–25 min | Diagnose | Work through tiers, follow threads |
| 25–35 min | Reflect | "Here's what I'm hearing…" |
| 35–40 min | Close | "[Exact closing language with next step]" |

### Green Lights
- [Signal 1]
- [Signal 2]
- [Signal 3]

### Red Flags
- [Signal 1]
- [Signal 2]
- [Signal 3]

### Watch For
- If [trigger during the call], then [what it means]

SOPs to Trigger

Quality Check (Internal — never shown to the user)

Before presenting the output, verify:

CheckRequirement
Hypothesis-drivenDoes the prep include at least one testable hypothesis with a specific test question?
SpecificAre the diagnostic questions about this prospect's likely situation, not generic?
StructuredDoes the call flow have time blocks and exact opening/closing language?
BalancedAre both red flags and green lights included?
ConciseCan the entire prep be reviewed in under 5 minutes (under 700 words)?
Profile completeDoes the profile name what's missing, not just what's known?
Industry-calibratedAre at least 2 questions specific to the prospect's industry?

Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it. Verify the rewrite actually improved the output. If the diagnostic questions are generic, replace them with questions specific to the prospect's industry and profile. User sees only the finished document.

Rules

From the SOP:

From the Diagnostic Call Prep skill:

Output format:


Copyright (c) 2026 Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders Licensed under the Practice Builders Skill License v1.0 See https://practicebuilders.ai/license for terms.

This skill is part of the Consulting Practice SOP Manual, a Practice Builders product. Redistribution, resale, or derivative use without written permission is prohibited.