← Vault Index
Source: business/products/consulting-practice-sop-manual/runners/client-offboarding-process-runner-SKILL.md

name: client-offboarding-process-runner description: > Executes the full Client Offboarding Process SOP — closure summary, referral ask, case study capture, and pipeline update. Run when an engagement end date is confirmed. metadata: author: "Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders" version: "1.0.0" date: "2026-04-28" sop: "Client Offboarding Process" category: "Client Communication" frequency: "Trigger-Based" estimated-time: "45 min" trigger: "When engagement end date is confirmed"


Client Offboarding Process — Runner

You are executing the Client Offboarding Process SOP for an independent consultant. Most consultants let engagements end with a handshake and a final invoice — and leave the next engagement, the case study, and the referral on the table. This runner closes the engagement at every layer: operationally, commercially, and relationally.

Do not skip steps. Do not ask questions across multiple turns — collect everything upfront.


What you'll have when this is done: A sent-ready closure summary, a referral ask email sent or logged as declined, a pipeline record updated with engagement-closed status and a re-engagement date trigger, and — if applicable — a draft case study in your queue.


Step 1: Collect All Inputs

Gather the following from the user in a single prompt. Accept whatever detail level they provide. Flag gaps but keep moving.

Engagement record:

Deliverables completed — for each deliverable:

Results and outcomes:

Open items — for each unfinished item:

Future work observations:

Referral context:

Case study eligibility:

Pipeline status:


Step 2: Confirm Deliverable Completion Against SOW

Review the deliverable list against the engagement scope. Produce a brief status check:

Rule: If the deliverable list has gaps against the stated scope, flag them before proceeding. The closure summary must be accurate — sending a document that claims completion when work is missing damages credibility.


Step 3: Build the Engagement Closure Summary (Condensed Skill)

Using the engagement details from Step 1, produce the full closure document.

3a. Engagement Overview

Structured header — not prose:

3b. Deliverables Table

DeliverableDescriptionStatusLocation
[Name][One sentence][Delivered / Implemented / In use][Where]

Include everything — documents, frameworks, processes, templates, training sessions, analyses. Completeness builds more credibility than curation.

3c. Results and Outcomes

Organize into three tiers:

Measurable Outcomes — Specific numbers using the client's metrics and language. If hard numbers aren't available, use before/after descriptions. Never inflate: if the improvement was 15%, don't round to 20%.

Capability Built — What the client or team can now do independently: processes they can run, decisions they can make, systems they can maintain.

Strategic Positioning — How the engagement positioned the client for what's next: risks identified, opportunities surfaced, foundations laid.

Format: Three sections with 2-4 bullet points each. Bold the outcome, then one sentence of context.

3d. Open Items and Handoff

ItemStatusRecommended ActionOwnerTimeline
[Item][Where it stands][What should happen next][Client team member][When]

Be honest about what's unfinished. A clearly documented open item with a recommended path forward shows more professionalism than a buried incomplete.

3e. Recommendations for Future Work

2-3 areas maximum. Rules:

3f. Closing Line

One sentence, genuine, not performative. Acknowledge the partnership and name one specific positive outcome.

Closure summary rules:

Quality gate — before proceeding:

CheckQuestion
CompletenessDoes the deliverables table include every output, not just the highlights?
Honest outcomesAre results claims supportable with evidence the client would recognize?
Clean handoffDoes every open item have an owner and a recommended next action?
Professional toneDoes it read as an authoritative record, not a farewell letter or a sales pitch?
Referral-readyCould the client forward this document to a colleague as proof of your work?

Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.


Step 4: Build the Referral Ask Email (Condensed Skill)

Using the referral context from Step 1, produce a warm, specific referral request email. This must be sent within 5 business days of the closure summary — the relationship is warmest immediately post-delivery.

4a. The Win Anchor (1-2 sentences)

Open with the specific deliverable and result. Name what you did and what happened because of it. Use the client's language. No generic "it was great working with you" — specificity signals that you're writing to them, not at them.

If the user provided a vague result, push for a number, a quote, or a before/after comparison before generating.

4b. The Bridge (1 sentence)

Connect their result to the type of person who'd benefit from the same kind of work. Pattern: "That result is exactly what I help [type of person] achieve."

4c. The Specific Ask (1-2 sentences)

Describe the ideal referral in concrete terms — role, situation, or symptom. Not "anyone who needs help" but "another [role] who's dealing with [specific problem]." Give the client a face to picture.

4d. The Easy Action (1 sentence)

One action, stated plainly: "Forward this email" or "make an introduction" or "share my name." One verb. No alternatives.

4e. Sign-Off

Warm but brief. No multi-line signatures or PS lines.

Output format:

Subject: Quick thought after [deliverable/project name]

[Client first name],

[Win anchor — 1-2 sentences naming the specific win.]

[Bridge — 1 sentence connecting their result to the type of person who'd benefit.]

[Specific ask — 1-2 sentences describing the ideal referral.]

[Easy action — 1 sentence with one verb.]

Thanks for trusting me with this — it means a lot.

[Your name]

Referral ask rules:

Quality gate — before proceeding:

#CheckFix
1Does it name a specific result, not a generic compliment?Replace any "great working with you" with the actual deliverable and outcome.
2Is the referral profile specific enough to trigger a mental match?Add a role title and a situation/symptom.
3Is the ask a single, clear action?Cut to one verb. Remove any "or if you prefer" alternatives.
4Does the tone feel like a continuation of the engagement, not a pivot to sales?Remove any language about services, pricing, or availability.
5Is the email under 150 words?Cut. Referral asks that run long don't get read.

Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.


Step 5: Build the Case Study (Condensed Skill — If Applicable)

Only run this step if the engagement generated a strong outcome (user confirmed "yes" or "partial" in Step 1). If "no," skip to Step 6.

5a. Situation Analysis (2-3 paragraphs, narrative prose)

Extract from the inputs:

Write as a story, not a diagnosis. Use specific details: "spending 12 hours a week on manual reporting" beats "inefficient processes."

5b. Approach and Intervention (numbered phases)

Name your frameworks if they have names. Focus on what makes your approach different. Don't oversimplify or overcomplicate.

5c. Results Table

MetricBeforeAfterChangeVerified
[Metric][Starting state][Ending state][% or absolute][Confirmed / Self-reported / Estimated]

Flag any estimated or unverified result. Never present an estimate as confirmed. Always include both relative and absolute numbers — "50% reduction" means nothing without the baseline.

5d. Client Voice

Use the provided quote (exact words, unpolished). If no quote, write a placeholder: "[Request client quote about: specific topic]."

5e. Multi-Format Output

Generate four versions:

  1. Full case study (500-800 words) — Complete narrative for website or standalone PDF
  2. Proposal insert (150-200 words) — Condensed for a proposal's "relevant experience" section
  3. Conversation version (2-3 sentences) — Verbal version for discovery calls: "We worked with a [type] that was [problem]. We [intervention] and they [result]."
  4. Headline stats — 3-5 standalone metrics for website banner or social media

Case study rules:

Quality gate — before proceeding:

CheckQuestion
Narrative arcSituation, approach, result — clear in one read?
SpecificityResults stated with specific numbers, not vague improvements?
RelatabilityWould a similar prospect see themselves in the opening?
HonestyAll unverified results flagged? Base numbers included?
Multi-formatAll four versions present and distinct (not truncated copies)?

Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.


Step 6: Update Pipeline Record

Produce the pipeline update instructions:


Step 7: Assemble Final Output

Present one unified document containing all sections:

A. Engagement Closure Summary

The full closure document from Step 3 — overview header, deliverables table, results (three tiers), open items table, future recommendations, and closing line. Ready to send to the client.

B. Referral Ask Email

The complete email from Step 4 — subject line, win anchor, bridge, specific ask, easy action, sign-off. Under 150 words. Ready to send within 5 business days of the closure summary.

C. Case Study (If Applicable)

All four formats from Step 5 — full case study, proposal insert, conversation version, headline stats. Flagged if client approval is needed before publishing.

D. Pipeline Update Record

The status changes and flags from Step 6 — engagement closed, referral status, case study status, 90-day re-engagement trigger.

E. Delivery Checklist

ItemStatus
All deliverables confirmed complete against SOW[complete / gaps flagged]
Closure summary finalized[complete / pending]
Closure summary sent to client[sent / scheduled / pending]
Referral ask email finalized[complete / pending]
Referral ask sent (within 5 business days of closure summary)[sent / scheduled / pending]
Case study draft complete[complete / not applicable / pending]
Client approval flagged for case study (if needed)[flagged / not needed / pending]
Pipeline record updated — engagement closed[complete / pending]
90-day re-engagement outreach flagged[date set / pending]

F. SOPs to Trigger


Quality Check

CheckPass?
Deliverable list matches SOW scope — no gaps hidden
Closure summary reads as authoritative record, not farewell letter
All results claims are supportable with client-recognized evidence
Every open item has an owner and recommended next action
Future recommendations connect to engagement observations, not generic upsells
Referral ask email names a specific win and a specific referral profile
Referral ask is under 150 words
Referral ask contains zero pricing, package, or availability language
Case study (if applicable) has all four format versions
Case study results include base numbers with percentage claims
Case study does not position the client as incompetent
Pipeline record includes closed status, referral status, and 90-day re-engagement date
Closure summary is formatted for client sharing (boss or board may see it)

Rules

  1. Send the closure summary before the final invoice — not with it. The closure summary is what makes clients describe you to their peers. If the invoice is the only closing communication, the relationship ends as transactional.
  2. Collect all inputs in one pass. Do not scatter prompts across multiple turns. Ask once, flag gaps, keep moving.
  3. Time the referral ask within 5 business days of the closure summary. Referrals have a shelf life. Once the client has moved on, your close rate drops significantly.
  4. Never skip the case study step when the outcome is strong. The outcome is freshest immediately post-engagement. A 10-minute capture now saves hours reconstructing it later.
  5. Don't inflate results in the closure summary. If the improvement was 15%, say 15%. The client was there — they know what happened. Honest documentation of a solid engagement is more persuasive than inflated claims about a great one.
  6. Include every deliverable, not just the impressive ones. Completeness builds more credibility than curation. The client should think "that's more than I realized."
  7. Open items get documented, not buried. A clearly documented open item with a recommended path forward shows more professionalism than a gap the client discovers later.
  8. The referral ask email never mentions pricing, packages, or your availability. It's a trust transfer, not a sales pitch.
  9. Keep the referral ask under 150 words. Shorter converts better. Cut anything that doesn't serve the win-bridge-ask-action structure.
  10. Don't use the word "referral" in the email to the client. It sounds transactional. The ask should feel like a natural continuation of the engagement.
  11. Always include base numbers with percentage claims in the case study. "400% increase in pipeline" means nothing if the starting number was near zero.
  12. Flag the 90-day re-engagement date. The pipeline record is incomplete without it. This is what turns a closed engagement into a future opportunity.
  13. Escape dollar signs as \$ for Notion compatibility.
  14. Flag inferred details. If a result or status was inferred rather than stated, mark it [INFERRED — verify].

Copyright (c) 2026 Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders Licensed under the Practice Builders Skill License v1.0 See https://practicebuilders.ai/license for terms.

This skill is part of the Consulting Practice SOP Manual, a Practice Builders product. Redistribution, resale, or derivative use without written permission is prohibited.