name: client-offboarding-process-runner description: > Executes the full Client Offboarding Process SOP — closure summary, referral ask, case study capture, and pipeline update. Run when an engagement end date is confirmed. metadata: author: "Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders" version: "1.0.0" date: "2026-04-28" sop: "Client Offboarding Process" category: "Client Communication" frequency: "Trigger-Based" estimated-time: "45 min" trigger: "When engagement end date is confirmed"
Client Offboarding Process — Runner
You are executing the Client Offboarding Process SOP for an independent consultant. Most consultants let engagements end with a handshake and a final invoice — and leave the next engagement, the case study, and the referral on the table. This runner closes the engagement at every layer: operationally, commercially, and relationally.
Do not skip steps. Do not ask questions across multiple turns — collect everything upfront.
What you'll have when this is done: A sent-ready closure summary, a referral ask email sent or logged as declined, a pipeline record updated with engagement-closed status and a re-engagement date trigger, and — if applicable — a draft case study in your queue.
Step 1: Collect All Inputs
Gather the following from the user in a single prompt. Accept whatever detail level they provide. Flag gaps but keep moving.
Engagement record:
- Client name and primary contact name
- Engagement type (retainer, project, sprint, advisory)
- Engagement period (start date — end date)
- Scope summary (1-2 sentences — what the engagement covered)
- Primary contacts (who you worked with, names and roles)
Deliverables completed — for each deliverable:
- Deliverable name
- Brief description (one sentence — what it does or contains)
- Status (delivered, implemented, in use)
- Location (where the client can find it)
Results and outcomes:
- Measurable outcomes (specific numbers: time saved, revenue impacted, costs reduced, efficiency gained — use client's metrics and language)
- Capability built (what the client or team can now do independently)
- Strategic positioning (how the engagement positioned the client for what's next)
Open items — for each unfinished item:
- What it is
- Current status
- Recommended next action
- Owner (client team member)
- Timeline (when it should be addressed)
Future work observations:
- 2-3 areas where the client could benefit from additional work (must connect to something observed during the engagement)
- Estimated scope or timeframe for each
Referral context:
- The specific deliverable and result you're most proud of (the "win" — stated in the client's language if possible)
- The type of person who'd benefit from the same kind of work (role + situation)
- Client's industry — do peers have similar problems?
Case study eligibility:
- Did the engagement generate a strong, measurable outcome? (yes / no / partial)
- Does the client need to approve before publishing? (yes / no / unknown)
- Can you name the client or must it be anonymized?
- If available: a client quote about the impact (exact words)
- The trigger — what made the client seek help in the first place?
- What had they tried before that didn't work?
Pipeline status:
- Where is this client tracked? (CRM, spreadsheet, pipeline tracker)
- Current record status (active, winding down, etc.)
- Any notes on referral likelihood (warm, neutral, unlikely)
Step 2: Confirm Deliverable Completion Against SOW
Review the deliverable list against the engagement scope. Produce a brief status check:
- Scope summary: What the engagement was supposed to deliver
- Deliverables confirmed complete: List each with status
- Gaps or discrepancies: Anything in scope that wasn't listed as delivered
- Open items count: Number of unfinished items with owners assigned
Rule: If the deliverable list has gaps against the stated scope, flag them before proceeding. The closure summary must be accurate — sending a document that claims completion when work is missing damages credibility.
Step 3: Build the Engagement Closure Summary (Condensed Skill)
Using the engagement details from Step 1, produce the full closure document.
3a. Engagement Overview
Structured header — not prose:
- Client: [Name]
- Engagement period: [Start date] — [End date]
- Scope: [One sentence]
- Primary contacts: [Names]
- Engagement type: [Retainer / project / sprint / advisory]
3b. Deliverables Table
| Deliverable | Description | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Name] | [One sentence] | [Delivered / Implemented / In use] | [Where] |
Include everything — documents, frameworks, processes, templates, training sessions, analyses. Completeness builds more credibility than curation.
3c. Results and Outcomes
Organize into three tiers:
Measurable Outcomes — Specific numbers using the client's metrics and language. If hard numbers aren't available, use before/after descriptions. Never inflate: if the improvement was 15%, don't round to 20%.
Capability Built — What the client or team can now do independently: processes they can run, decisions they can make, systems they can maintain.
Strategic Positioning — How the engagement positioned the client for what's next: risks identified, opportunities surfaced, foundations laid.
Format: Three sections with 2-4 bullet points each. Bold the outcome, then one sentence of context.
3d. Open Items and Handoff
| Item | Status | Recommended Action | Owner | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Item] | [Where it stands] | [What should happen next] | [Client team member] | [When] |
Be honest about what's unfinished. A clearly documented open item with a recommended path forward shows more professionalism than a buried incomplete.
3e. Recommendations for Future Work
2-3 areas maximum. Rules:
- Each must connect to something observed during the engagement — not a generic upsell
- Frame as observations: "During the engagement, I noticed [pattern]. Addressing this would [benefit]."
- Include an estimated scope or timeframe for each
- Do not price these unless asked
3f. Closing Line
One sentence, genuine, not performative. Acknowledge the partnership and name one specific positive outcome.
Closure summary rules:
- Use the client's language throughout. If they call it a "client onboarding process," don't rename it.
- Format so the client can share internally — their boss or board may see this.
- Never inflate results. Precision signals honesty.
- Every open item must have an owner and a recommended next action.
Quality gate — before proceeding:
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Completeness | Does the deliverables table include every output, not just the highlights? |
| Honest outcomes | Are results claims supportable with evidence the client would recognize? |
| Clean handoff | Does every open item have an owner and a recommended next action? |
| Professional tone | Does it read as an authoritative record, not a farewell letter or a sales pitch? |
| Referral-ready | Could the client forward this document to a colleague as proof of your work? |
Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.
Step 4: Build the Referral Ask Email (Condensed Skill)
Using the referral context from Step 1, produce a warm, specific referral request email. This must be sent within 5 business days of the closure summary — the relationship is warmest immediately post-delivery.
4a. The Win Anchor (1-2 sentences)
Open with the specific deliverable and result. Name what you did and what happened because of it. Use the client's language. No generic "it was great working with you" — specificity signals that you're writing to them, not at them.
If the user provided a vague result, push for a number, a quote, or a before/after comparison before generating.
4b. The Bridge (1 sentence)
Connect their result to the type of person who'd benefit from the same kind of work. Pattern: "That result is exactly what I help [type of person] achieve."
4c. The Specific Ask (1-2 sentences)
Describe the ideal referral in concrete terms — role, situation, or symptom. Not "anyone who needs help" but "another [role] who's dealing with [specific problem]." Give the client a face to picture.
4d. The Easy Action (1 sentence)
One action, stated plainly: "Forward this email" or "make an introduction" or "share my name." One verb. No alternatives.
4e. Sign-Off
Warm but brief. No multi-line signatures or PS lines.
Output format:
Subject: Quick thought after [deliverable/project name]
[Client first name],
[Win anchor — 1-2 sentences naming the specific win.]
[Bridge — 1 sentence connecting their result to the type of person who'd benefit.]
[Specific ask — 1-2 sentences describing the ideal referral.]
[Easy action — 1 sentence with one verb.]
Thanks for trusting me with this — it means a lot.
[Your name]
Referral ask rules:
- Never mention pricing or packages — the referral email is not a sales pitch
- Total email under 150 words — shorter converts better
- Always name the specific deliverable and result, never generalize
- The ask must specify a role and situation, not "anyone who needs help"
- One call to action only — don't give the client options
- Don't use the word "referral" in the email — it sounds transactional
- If the client result is vague, ask the user for specifics before generating
Quality gate — before proceeding:
| # | Check | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does it name a specific result, not a generic compliment? | Replace any "great working with you" with the actual deliverable and outcome. |
| 2 | Is the referral profile specific enough to trigger a mental match? | Add a role title and a situation/symptom. |
| 3 | Is the ask a single, clear action? | Cut to one verb. Remove any "or if you prefer" alternatives. |
| 4 | Does the tone feel like a continuation of the engagement, not a pivot to sales? | Remove any language about services, pricing, or availability. |
| 5 | Is the email under 150 words? | Cut. Referral asks that run long don't get read. |
Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.
Step 5: Build the Case Study (Condensed Skill — If Applicable)
Only run this step if the engagement generated a strong outcome (user confirmed "yes" or "partial" in Step 1). If "no," skip to Step 6.
5a. Situation Analysis (2-3 paragraphs, narrative prose)
Extract from the inputs:
- The core problem — the single biggest constraint, in the client's language
- The business impact — how it affected revenue, capacity, experience, or morale
- The trigger — what made them seek help
- The stakes — what would have happened if they'd done nothing
Write as a story, not a diagnosis. Use specific details: "spending 12 hours a week on manual reporting" beats "inefficient processes."
5b. Approach and Intervention (numbered phases)
- Discovery/Diagnostic — what you assessed and found (1-2 sentences)
- Key interventions — 2-4 specific actions, each named and described in one sentence
- Timeline — engagement duration and key milestones
Name your frameworks if they have names. Focus on what makes your approach different. Don't oversimplify or overcomplicate.
5c. Results Table
| Metric | Before | After | Change | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Starting state] | [Ending state] | [% or absolute] | [Confirmed / Self-reported / Estimated] |
Flag any estimated or unverified result. Never present an estimate as confirmed. Always include both relative and absolute numbers — "50% reduction" means nothing without the baseline.
5d. Client Voice
Use the provided quote (exact words, unpolished). If no quote, write a placeholder: "[Request client quote about: specific topic]."
5e. Multi-Format Output
Generate four versions:
- Full case study (500-800 words) — Complete narrative for website or standalone PDF
- Proposal insert (150-200 words) — Condensed for a proposal's "relevant experience" section
- Conversation version (2-3 sentences) — Verbal version for discovery calls: "We worked with a [type] that was [problem]. We [intervention] and they [result]."
- Headline stats — 3-5 standalone metrics for website banner or social media
Case study rules:
- Never fabricate or inflate results. If data is thin, say so and recommend what to ask the client.
- Use the client's language for the problem, your language for the solution.
- Anonymize properly if required — no context clues that identify the client.
- Keep the full version under 800 words.
- Never position the client as incompetent — the situation should feel like a common, understandable challenge.
- Include base numbers with all percentage claims.
Quality gate — before proceeding:
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Narrative arc | Situation, approach, result — clear in one read? |
| Specificity | Results stated with specific numbers, not vague improvements? |
| Relatability | Would a similar prospect see themselves in the opening? |
| Honesty | All unverified results flagged? Base numbers included? |
| Multi-format | All four versions present and distinct (not truncated copies)? |
Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it before proceeding.
Step 6: Update Pipeline Record
Produce the pipeline update instructions:
- Client status: Mark engagement as CLOSED
- Closure date: [End date]
- Referral status: [Sent / Logged as declined / Pending]
- Case study status: [Draft complete / Awaiting client approval / Not applicable / Flagged for follow-up]
- Re-engagement outreach: Flag for 90-day mark — [specific date, calculated from end date]
- Notes: Any context for future reference (engagement highlights, relationship warmth, referral likelihood)
Step 7: Assemble Final Output
Present one unified document containing all sections:
A. Engagement Closure Summary
The full closure document from Step 3 — overview header, deliverables table, results (three tiers), open items table, future recommendations, and closing line. Ready to send to the client.
B. Referral Ask Email
The complete email from Step 4 — subject line, win anchor, bridge, specific ask, easy action, sign-off. Under 150 words. Ready to send within 5 business days of the closure summary.
C. Case Study (If Applicable)
All four formats from Step 5 — full case study, proposal insert, conversation version, headline stats. Flagged if client approval is needed before publishing.
D. Pipeline Update Record
The status changes and flags from Step 6 — engagement closed, referral status, case study status, 90-day re-engagement trigger.
E. Delivery Checklist
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| All deliverables confirmed complete against SOW | [complete / gaps flagged] |
| Closure summary finalized | [complete / pending] |
| Closure summary sent to client | [sent / scheduled / pending] |
| Referral ask email finalized | [complete / pending] |
| Referral ask sent (within 5 business days of closure summary) | [sent / scheduled / pending] |
| Case study draft complete | [complete / not applicable / pending] |
| Client approval flagged for case study (if needed) | [flagged / not needed / pending] |
| Pipeline record updated — engagement closed | [complete / pending] |
| 90-day re-engagement outreach flagged | [date set / pending] |
F. SOPs to Trigger
- [ ] Re-Engagement Outreach — trigger at the 90-day mark post-closure ([specific date])
- [ ] Case Study Approval Follow-Up — if client approval is needed, follow up within 2 weeks
Quality Check
| Check | Pass? |
|---|---|
| Deliverable list matches SOW scope — no gaps hidden | |
| Closure summary reads as authoritative record, not farewell letter | |
| All results claims are supportable with client-recognized evidence | |
| Every open item has an owner and recommended next action | |
| Future recommendations connect to engagement observations, not generic upsells | |
| Referral ask email names a specific win and a specific referral profile | |
| Referral ask is under 150 words | |
| Referral ask contains zero pricing, package, or availability language | |
| Case study (if applicable) has all four format versions | |
| Case study results include base numbers with percentage claims | |
| Case study does not position the client as incompetent | |
| Pipeline record includes closed status, referral status, and 90-day re-engagement date | |
| Closure summary is formatted for client sharing (boss or board may see it) |
Rules
- Send the closure summary before the final invoice — not with it. The closure summary is what makes clients describe you to their peers. If the invoice is the only closing communication, the relationship ends as transactional.
- Collect all inputs in one pass. Do not scatter prompts across multiple turns. Ask once, flag gaps, keep moving.
- Time the referral ask within 5 business days of the closure summary. Referrals have a shelf life. Once the client has moved on, your close rate drops significantly.
- Never skip the case study step when the outcome is strong. The outcome is freshest immediately post-engagement. A 10-minute capture now saves hours reconstructing it later.
- Don't inflate results in the closure summary. If the improvement was 15%, say 15%. The client was there — they know what happened. Honest documentation of a solid engagement is more persuasive than inflated claims about a great one.
- Include every deliverable, not just the impressive ones. Completeness builds more credibility than curation. The client should think "that's more than I realized."
- Open items get documented, not buried. A clearly documented open item with a recommended path forward shows more professionalism than a gap the client discovers later.
- The referral ask email never mentions pricing, packages, or your availability. It's a trust transfer, not a sales pitch.
- Keep the referral ask under 150 words. Shorter converts better. Cut anything that doesn't serve the win-bridge-ask-action structure.
- Don't use the word "referral" in the email to the client. It sounds transactional. The ask should feel like a natural continuation of the engagement.
- Always include base numbers with percentage claims in the case study. "400% increase in pipeline" means nothing if the starting number was near zero.
- Flag the 90-day re-engagement date. The pipeline record is incomplete without it. This is what turns a closed engagement into a future opportunity.
- Escape dollar signs as \$ for Notion compatibility.
- Flag inferred details. If a result or status was inferred rather than stated, mark it [INFERRED — verify].
Copyright (c) 2026 Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders Licensed under the Practice Builders Skill License v1.0 See https://practicebuilders.ai/license for terms.
This skill is part of the Consulting Practice SOP Manual, a Practice Builders product. Redistribution, resale, or derivative use without written permission is prohibited.