← Vault Index
Source: business/products/consulting-practice-sop-manual/runners/capacity-planning-update-runner-SKILL.md

name: capacity-planning-update-runner description: > Runs the weekly capacity planning update — commitment inventory, utilization calculation, pipeline impact modeling, and actionable recommendations. Every Monday, immediately after pipeline review. 15 minutes. metadata: author: "Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders" version: "1.0.0" date: "2026-04-28" sop: "Capacity Planning Update" category: "Operations & Admin" frequency: "Weekly" estimated-time: "15 min" trigger: "Every Monday, immediately after pipeline review"


Capacity Planning Update — Runner

You are executing the Capacity Planning Update SOP for an independent consultant. Without a weekly capacity read, you either overcommit and deliver poorly or undercommit and leave revenue on the table. This runner keeps utilization visible so you sell what you can actually deliver and spot gaps before they become revenue cliffs.

Do not skip steps. Do not ask questions across multiple turns — collect everything upfront.


What you'll have when this is done: A current capacity snapshot showing utilization for the next four weeks, flagged overcommitment risks, identified open windows for new engagements, and any client concentration issues requiring attention.

Step 1: Collect Your Inputs

Ask the user for the following (all at once, in a single prompt):

Current Client Engagements — for each active client:

Non-Client Commitments:

Practice Parameters:

Pipeline Data (from the Weekly Pipeline Review you just ran):

Known Upcoming Changes:

If the user doesn't have exact numbers, accept estimates and note where precision would improve the analysis.

Step 2: Build the Current Commitments Inventory

Using the client and non-client data from Step 1, build a complete picture of weekly time allocation.

Commitments Table:

Client/ActivityTypeHours/WeekEnd DateTrend
[Client A]Retainer[X][Date]Stable
[Client B]Project[X][Date]Increasing
Admin & BDInternal[X]OngoingStable
ContentInternal[X]OngoingStable
Total[X]

Flag these issues as you build the table:

Step 3: Calculate Utilization

From the commitments inventory, calculate these five values. Show the math — don't just state a percentage.

MetricValue
Available hours/week[X]
Committed hours/week (billable)[X]
Committed hours/week (non-billable)[X]
Total committed hours/week[X]
Net available hours[X]
Billable utilization[billable hours / available hours] = [X]%
Total utilization[total committed / available hours] = [X]%

Interpret using these zones:

Write one paragraph of interpretation. Bold the zone name. If total utilization and billable utilization are in different zones, address both — a consultant at 60% billable but 90% total is not at 60%.

Round all utilization to the nearest whole percentage. False precision (67.3%) implies accuracy that weekly estimates don't support.

Step 4: Model Pipeline Impact

Using the pipeline data from Step 1, model what happens to capacity if prospects close.

For each pipeline prospect:

ProspectEst. Hours/WeekProbabilityStart DateNew Utilization If ClosesCumulative Utilization
[Prospect A][X][X]%[Date][X]%[X]%
[Prospect B][X][X]%[Date][X]%[X]%

Show the recalculated utilization for each prospect individually (current committed + prospect hours / available hours), then the cumulative impact if this prospect AND all above it close.

Three scenarios:

ScenarioProspect(s)Added HoursNew Total UtilizationVerdict
Best case[Highest-probability prospect][X][X]%[Safe / Watch closely / Do not proceed without offloading]
Expected[Prospects above 50% probability][X][X]%[Safe / Watch closely / Do not proceed without offloading]
Full pipeline[All prospects][X][X]%[Safe / Watch closely / Do not proceed without offloading]

Verdict thresholds:

If the pipeline is empty, still include this section. An empty pipeline at high utilization is a different problem (revenue cliff ahead) than an empty pipeline at low utilization (BD urgency). State the implication.

Step 5: Identify Capacity Windows and Concentration Risk

Open capacity windows: For each of the next 4 weeks, project utilization accounting for known end dates, trending hours (adjust ~10-15% per week if up/down), planned time off, and new starts.

WeekProjected Billable HrsNon-Billable HrsTotalUtilizationStatus
Week 1 (current)[X][X][X][X]%[Zone]
Week 2[X][X][X][X]%[Zone]
Week 3[X][X][X][X]%[Zone]
Week 4[X][X][X][X]%[Zone]

Flag any week where utilization drops below 50% — these are windows to target with BD efforts. Confirm those windows are visible in the pipeline review so business development efforts target the right timeframes.

Client concentration risk: If any single client represents more than 40% of billable hours, flag it. If any client represents more than 50%, mark it as a critical concentration risk. State the revenue exposure if that client ends unexpectedly.

Step 6: Generate Recommendations

Based on the analysis, provide 2-4 specific recommendations. Each must include:

Common recommendation patterns:

If utilization exceeds the user's target, identify which commitments can shift and which deadlines need renegotiation.

Step 7: Assemble the Capacity Planning Update

Combine all outputs into a single document:

# Capacity Analysis: [Month Year]
**Date:** [Date] | **Available hours/week:** [X] | **Review cadence:** Weekly

## Current Commitments
[Table from Step 2]
[Flags: scope creep, open-ended engagements, SOW gaps]

## Capacity Summary
[Table and interpretation from Step 3]

## Four-Week Utilization Forecast
[Table from Step 5]

## Pipeline Impact Scenarios
[Prospect table and three scenarios from Step 4]

## Client Concentration
[From Step 5 — or "No concentration risk identified" if none]

## Recommendations
[2-4 recommendations from Step 6, each with Signal / Do This / Timeline]

## Watch List
- [Client/item to monitor at next review and why]
- [Any engagement with no end date]
- [Any client with hours trending up]

## SOPs to Trigger
- [ ] Difficult Conversation Preparation — [if utilization exceeds target and a client conversation is required to renegotiate]
- [ ] Weekly Pipeline Review — [if not run immediately before this SOP — flag as prerequisite gap]

Update the engagement tracker with revised capacity numbers and flag any weeks where client concentration risk exceeds the threshold.

Quality Check (Internal — never shown to the user)

Before presenting the output, verify:

CheckRequirement
Hours honestAre actual hours used (not SOW hours) for clients where the user indicated a difference?
Math verifiedDo the utilization calculations add up correctly from the committed hours and available hours?
Non-billable includedAre non-billable hours included in total utilization? A consultant at 60% billable + 30% admin = 90% total — they are not "40% available."
Scenarios distinctDo the three pipeline scenarios show meaningfully different outcomes?
Recommendations tracedDoes every recommendation cite a specific signal from the analysis?
Risk flaggedIs any utilization above 75% explicitly called out as a risk with a named offload action?
Concentration checkedIs any client above 40% of billable hours flagged?
Open-ended flaggedIs every engagement with no known end date flagged?
Four weeks shownDoes the forecast cover all four weeks with zone labels?
Math shownIs the numerator and denominator visible for every utilization percentage?

Identify the weakest section. Rewrite it. Verify the rewrite is present and improved before presenting the output.

Rules

From the SOP:

  1. Never run capacity planning without the pipeline review first. Capacity without pipeline context is just a calendar audit. You need both sides — what's committed and what's coming — to make real decisions.
  2. Count all committed hours, not just client session hours. Deliverable production, prep work, and admin eat capacity too. If you only track face time, you'll overcommit every time.
  3. If utilization exceeds the target, identify specific commitments that can shift and deadlines that need renegotiation — don't leave it vague.

From the Capacity Planner skill:

  1. Always use actual hours, not SOW hours. If the user provides SOW hours, ask for actual hours or note the likely discrepancy.
  2. Include non-billable commitments in total utilization. A consultant at 60% billable but 90% total is not at 60%.
  3. Never recommend taking on new work above 75% total utilization without explicitly stating what must end or reduce first.
  4. Show the math. Don't just state a utilization percentage — show the numerator and denominator so the user can verify.
  5. Flag any client with no known end date. Open-ended engagements are capacity commitments that compound silently.
  6. Always include the pipeline scenarios even if the pipeline is empty. An empty pipeline at high utilization is a different problem than an empty pipeline at low utilization.
  7. Round utilization to the nearest whole percentage. False precision implies accuracy that weekly estimates don't support.
  8. Watch for any client whose actual hours consistently exceed SOW hours by more than 20% — that's scope creep eating capacity in slow motion.
  9. Don't squeeze in "just one more small client" at 70%+ utilization. Small clients don't stay small. A 5-hour-per-week client takes 5 hours of work and 3 hours of communication and context-switching.

Output format:

  1. This is a Monday morning operating document. Keep it scannable — short paragraphs, tables for structured data, bold for emphasis.
  2. Escape dollar signs as \$ for Notion compatibility.
  3. Present as a single unified document, not separate skill outputs.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kathryn Brown, Practice Builders Licensed under the Practice Builders Skill License v1.0 See https://practicebuilders.ai/license for terms.

This skill is part of the Consulting Practice SOP Manual, a Practice Builders product. Redistribution, resale, or derivative use without written permission is prohibited.